Monday, September 21, 2026Get The Brief →
The Brief
Subscribe
PoliticsBusinessEconomyTechnologyWorldCulture
Latest
The Brief
Channels
The outlet
Politics

Trump Shrinks Monument Acreage

Trump cut Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante by nearly 3 million acres total, setting up a fresh court fight over how far presidents can stretch the Antiquities Act. Supporters say the move restores the law's 'smallest area' limit and public access; opponents call it executive overreach.
MH
Marcus Hale
Politics Reporter · Sunday, September 20, 2026 · 1 min read
Share on XWhatsApp

Driving the news: On July 13, President Donald Trump issued proclamations reducing Bears Ears National Monument from about 1.36 million acres to about 121,000 acres, and Grand Staircase-Escalante from about 1.87 million acres to about 181,500 acres.

Combined, the changes remove nearly 3 million acres from monument status. The remaining land stays federally managed, but the proclamations restore public access and reopen activities including 'grazing, timber harvest, fishing, hunting, resource development, infrastructure upgrades, and motorized recreation.'

Why it matters: The fight is over the Antiquities Act of 1906 and how much power one president has to lock up public land. The law says reserved land should be 'confined to the smallest area compatible' with protecting the object at issue.

The Daily Signal argues presidents have gone far beyond that limit, turning 'objects of scientific interest' into entire ecosystems, viewsheds, recreation economies and 'climate narratives.' It says Congress, not the White House, has the authority to create parks, wilderness preserves or recreation areas at landscape scale.

Between the lines: Conservation groups, outdoor retailers and some tribal governments have reopened a 2017 case and filed new challenges. The Supreme Court has not settled how far the act reaches.

Chief Justice John Roberts warned in 2021 that the 'smallest area compatible' restriction 'has ceased to pose any meaningful restraint.' He said the statute has been transformed into 'a power without any discernible limit' to set aside vast expanses of land and sea.

The bottom line: This is a classic Washington power fight. One side wants broad presidential control over federal lands; the other says taxpayer-owned land should not be boxed up by unilateral decree when Congress has not voted for it.

Go deeper

PoliticsAnalysis
Revive classical education, curb the state
→ Go deeper · 1 min read
PoliticsAnalysis
License Is Eroding Civil Society
→ Go deeper · 1 min read
Politics
States Push SAVE Laws as Senate Stalls
→ Go deeper · 1 min read